The definition of AI is increasingly relevant in legal education due to the rapid advancements in AI technology and its growing influence on various aspects of law and society. Understanding the definition of AI is essential for legal professionals to navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding AI technology. By understanding AI definitions, educators, law students, and legal professionals can effectively contribute to developing legal frameworks, addressing AI-driven decisions' ethical implications, and leveraging AI to improve legal practice.
The concept of AI lacks a universally accepted definition, although several key definitions have been created through a provision in the U.S. Code (U.S.C.), ABA Formal Opinion 512, three Presidential Executive Orders, and a publication by the Department of Commerce, as well as guidelines promulgated by global multilateral organizations and foreign jurisdictions.
According to ABA Standing Comm. on Ethics & Pro. Resp., Formal Op. 512 (2024), AI involves computer technology, software, and systems that can perform tasks that traditionally require human intelligence. This refers to the ability to perform tasks commonly associated with intelligent beings. The term is often used to describe the development of systems that seem to use or imitate human-like intellectual processes, such as reasoning, understanding meanings, generalizing, and learning from past experiences.
The National Artificial Intelligence Initiative, 15 U.S.C. 9401(3), defines AI as "a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations or decisions influencing real or virtual environments." The statute further provides that AI systems use machine- and human-based inputs to (A) perceive real and virtual environments; (B) abstract such perceptions into models
through analysis in an automated manner; and (C) use model inference to formulate options for information or action.
Three Executive Orders (Nos. 13,859, 14,110, and 14,141) address the subject of AI. The former order outlines principles for the use of AI in federal agencies, such as ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. The latter order focuses on promoting responsible AI development and use, including addressing issues like bias, privacy, and national security.
In responding to Executive Order 13,859, the U.S. Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards and Technology referenced the following two definitions for AI in its U.S. Leadership in AI: A Plan for Federal Engagement in Developing Technical Standards and Related Tools (Appendix I, p. 25).
In its Guidelines and Regulations to Provide Insights on Public Policies to Ensure AI’s Beneficial Use as a Professional Tool, the International Bar Association (IBA) provides detailed information on the use of AI (and varying AI definitions) in the main multilateral organizations and several jurisdictions worldwide.
The Law Library of Congress has published a comprehensive report (Innovative Technology in Legislatures in Selected Countries) that examines how legislative bodies are adopting and utilizing innovative technological infrastructures, including AI tools, to enhance their parliamentary processes, services, and functions. Notably, the report reveals a lack of references to a clear definition of AI.